image displayed if flash reader not installed
 

Terrell's Island

Open to the Public every day from Sunrise to Sunset.

2008 and 2010 Terrell’s Island Vegetation Surveys

 

Andrew Sabai

September 2010

 

In 2008 and 2010, aquatic plant surveys were conducted within the break wall at Terrell’s Island, Lake Butte des Morts using standard DNR point intercept methods of Hauxwell et al 2004.  The 2008 survey was conducted July 13-15 and the 2010 survey was done August 23-25.  Although over a month apart, results of occurrence should be similar.  However, as would be expected biomass, reflected as rakefullness in this method, in August was greater than in July.  No comparison should be drawn between the two years in rakefullness.  Caution should be used when looking at the relative frequency of species between years; it does not necessarily equal changes in abundance.  For example, wild celery made up 54.4% of the plant community in 2008, and 37.5% in 2010.  This should not be taken as a loss of wild celery abundance, but a loss in its dominance in the community.  In fact wild celery was found at 265 points in 2008 and 287 points in 2010, an increase of more than 9%.  

 

Figure 1. 2008 vegetated sample points

 

SUMMARY STATS:

2008

2010

Total number of points sampled

461

458

Total number of sites with vegetation

306

329

Total number of sites shallower than maximum depth of plants

461

458

Frequency of occurrence at sites shallower than maximum depth of plants

66.38

71.83

Simpson Diversity Index

0.68

.76

Maximum depth of plants (ft)

5

5

Average Depth (ft)

3.6

3.7

Number of sites sampled using rake on Pole (P)

461

458

Average number of all species per site (shallower than max depth)

1.05

1.67

Average number of all species per site (veg. sites only)

1.59

2.33

Average number of native species per site (shallower than max depth)

0.98

1.64

Average number of native species per site (veg. sites only)

1.50

2.29

Species Richness

18

17

Species Richness (including visuals)

27

25

Species Richness (including visuals) native

24

23

Average Coefficient of Conservatism

5.43

5.33

FQI

24.88

24.44

 

 

 

2008 and 2010 Aquatic Vegetation Composition

Scientific Name

Common Name

Coefficient of Conservatism

Relative Frequency (%) 2008

Relative Frequency (%) 2010

Ceratophyllum demersum

Coontail

3

8.6

6.3

Chara sp.

Muskgrasses

7

absent

3.5

Eleocharis sp.

Spike-rush sp.

NA

present

absent

Elodea canadensis

Common waterweed

3

0.2

8.1

Heteranthera dubia

Water star-grass

6

0.2

4.1

Lemna minor

Small duckweed

4

present

present

Lemna trisulca

Forked duckweed

6

present

absent

Lythrum salicaria

Purple loosestrife

Non-native

present

present

Myriophyllum sibiricum

Northern water-milfoil

6

8.6

4.6

Myriophyllum spicatum

Eurasian water milfoil

Non-native

4.9

1.8

Najas sp.

Naiad sp.

6

4.5

28.3

Nelumbo lutea

American lotus

7

0.8

1.2

Nuphar variegata

Spatterdock

6

present

absent

Nymphaea odorata

White water lily

6

0.8

1.0

Potamogeton crispus

Curly-leaf pondweed

Non-native

1.6

absent

Potamogeton nodosus

Long-leaf pondweed

7

absent

0.1

Potamogeton pusillus

Small pondweed

7

3.3

0.3

Potamogeton richardsonii

Clasping-leaf pondweed

5

2.1

2.2

Potamogeton zosteriformis

Flat-stem pondweed

6

1.2

absent

Sagittaria latifolia

Common arrowhead

3

absent

0.1

Sagittaria rigida

Stiff arrowhead

8

0.2

present

Schoenoplectus sp.

Round-stem bulrush

4

absent

0.1

Spirodela polyrhiza

Large duckweed

5

present

present

Stuckenia pectinata

Sago pondweed

3

7.6

0.1

Typha spp.

Cattail spp.

1

present

present

Utricularia vulgaris

Common bladderwort

7

present

0.3

Vallisneria americana

Wild celery

6

54.4

37.5

Wolffia columbiana

Common watermeal

5

present

present

Zizania sp.

Wild rice

8

0.2

present

Filamentous Algae

 

NA

present

present

Unknown sp.

 

NA

0.2

absent

 

 

 

Figure 4.  Background: stiff arrowhead.  Foreground: white water-lily (photo 7/7/2008)


 

           

Figures 5 and 6. Depth distribution of sample points

 

 

References

Hauxwell, J., S. Knight, K. Wagner, and A. Mikulyuk. 2008. Recommended Baseline Monitoring of Aquatic Macrophytes in Wisconsin - Point-Intercept Sampling Method, Collection Protocol, Data Analyses and Applications. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison WI. 26 pp.

 

Terrell’s Island Vegetation Survey Comparisons 1988-2010

Andrew Sabai

September 2010

 

Vegetation surveys were completed at Terrell’s Island before and directly after break wall construction using transects.  1999-2001 used the methods of Deppe and Lathrop (1992).  In 2008 and 2010 a point intercept method (Hauxwell et. al. 2008) was used for all navigable water within the break wall.  The following data from 2008 and 2010 uses only those points that fall within the box in Fig. 1, making accurate comparisons of these surveys.  Although different sampling techniques were used prior to 2008 both techniques should give comparable relative frequencies for each species. Data prior to 2008 from Cooke et al. 2005. Caution should be used when looking at the relative frequency of species between years; it does not necessarily equal changes in abundance of individual species.

 

 

Figure 1: Terrell’s Island.  Green dots are 2008/2010 survey points.  Only dots within the break wall and the box were used for comparison.  Yellow lines represent the approximate locations of older transects. Red outlines designate the extent of wetland and aquatic vegetation.

 

Species

Ave 1988-1994

1999

2000

2001

2008

2010

Stuckenia pectinata

45

15.4

5.8

1.5

8.5

0.3

Vallisneria americana

15.8

1.6

5.8

12.8

56.7

44.2

Ceratophyllum demersum

4

4.1

0.7

0.2

9.7

3.9

Elodea canadensis

0.3

33.7

51.7

35

0.3

5

Heteranthera dubia

6.9

8.2

10.9

23.4

0.3

3.3

Najas sp

12.7

11

0

0

4.7

27.2

Chara sp

4.1

0.9

2.7

1.5

0

3.6

Myriophyllum spicatum

10.9

14.6

6.5

5.5

3.4

2.8

Potamogeton pusillus

0.5

10.6

2

0

0.9

0

Potamogeton crispus

x

x

6.2

17.5

1.9

0

Myriophyllum sibiricum

x

x

1.6

0.8

8.2

5.6

other species <1%

x

x

6.2

0.9

1.3

0.5

Potamogeton zosteriformis

x

x

x

x

1.9

0

Potamogeton richardsonii

x

x

x

x

2.2

3.6

 

 

References

 

G. D., Cooke, E. B. Welch, S. Peterson, S. A. Nichols. 2005. Restoration and Management of Lakes and Reservoirs, Third Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 616 pp.  

Deppe E. R., Lathrop R. C. 1992 A Comparison of Two Rake Sampling Techniques for Sampling Aquatic Macrophytes. Research/Management Findings Number 32 Bureau of Research, Department of Natural Resources, Madison WI. 5 pp. 

Hauxwell, J., S. Knight, K. Wagner, and A. Mikulyuk. 2008. Recommended Baseline Monitoring of Aquatic Macrophytes in Wisconsin - Point-Intercept Sampling Method, Collection Protocol, Data Analyses and Applications. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison WI. 26 pp.

 

 Conclusion

 

The reports deal with the composition of the plant community within the break wall,  but there is a significant omission in them, and that is the area colonized by submerged vegetation.  The average between 1975-79 was 128.6 acres of submergent vegetation.  In 2008 I calculated 345 acres of submergent and floating leaf plants, a 168% increase in vegetation.  In every other area there was either no change or a loss of vegetation from 75-79 to the 2008/2009 surveys.  In fact if it were not for the increase of vegetation at Terrell's Island, Lake Butte des Morts would have had a 31% loss, but with Terrell's Island it experience a 9% gain.  It is hugely important to the Upper Pool as a whole too,  without a 42% loss, with a 27% loss.